Home fitness ethical requirements

The core ethical requirements of home fitness are essentially the three basic principles of "not disturbing neighbors, not harming oneself, and not spreading falsehoods." All specific behavioral norms are an extension of these three in different scenarios. There are no complicated provisions, and they are all boundaries that ordinary people can implement.

I have seen many groups of property owners quarreling over home fitness. One party slapped the table and said, "I bought a house with my own money. You can dance as much as you want. If it's too noisy, why don't you go live in a villa?" The other party posted a video of the dust falling off the ceiling and the recorded noise of more than 60 decibels. They were extremely aggrieved and said: "I came home from get off work and wanted to have a quiet rest. Why should I have to suffer the consequences of your banging?" Both sides have their own reasons. Essentially, it is a matter of poor understanding of the boundaries of property rights. The legal community has long concluded that the exclusive right to use part of a living space cannot infringe upon the neighbor's right to peace. Vibrations and low-frequency noise are immeasurable infringements and should be actively controlled. When I first started practicing kettlebells last year, I had no experience, so I only put a thin layer of foam pad on it, which made a clanging sound on the floor. That night, the aunt downstairs knocked on my door with half a bag of sugar oranges. Instead of scolding me, she handed me a leftover piece of high-density soundproof pad leftover from her home. I blushed at the time, and the next day I replaced it with a 2cm thick rubber pad. After that, I was never asked for Pamela dance or deadlift practice again. To be honest, the cost is not high, and it is much more comfortable than fighting against people in the group every day. Some people also say that I only practice during the day on weekdays when everyone is at work. Is there anything wrong with that? You should also pay attention. If there are people working from home, confinement, or working shifts to catch up on sleep, don't think that they have too much to do if someone comes to your door. It is not difficult to take a step back and adjust the time, or change to some non-jumping strength training movements.

Compared with friction with neighbors, more people fall into traps that actually trap themselves. The fitness circle has been quarreling over this matter all year round. One group believes in "No pain, no gain" as a guideline, and believes that training is perfect until the muscles tremble and the walking becomes shaky. The other group, who does exercise rehabilitation, advises you every day: "Pain is your body giving you an alarm. If you continue to persist, you will go to the hospital." I received a consultation from a fan before. The girl just graduated and rented a small single room. She followed the online "Lose 10 pounds in 7 days and burn fat quickly" exercise. She danced for two hours every day. She didn't buy any sports shoes, so she jumped on the floor with bare feet. After half a month, she didn't lose much weight. She first developed patellar tendonitis and had to hold on to the railings even when going up and down stairs. In fact, in home fitness, there is no coach to watch and correct the movements. If you feel pain in the joints, dizziness and nausea, don't insist on "holding on for the last set". Stopping and resting will be better than anything else. If you really want to pursue the ultimate muscle-building and fat-loss effect, why not go to the gym and find a certified personal trainer? Wouldn’t it be more comfortable to practice at home? If you don't have to deal with your own body, a pair of training shoes and a suitable mat that cost tens of dollars are more cost-effective than going to the hospital and spending hundreds of dollars to take X-rays.

If you feel good about practicing and want to share it online, you must remember the third principle: don’t mislead others. Nowadays, when watching short videos, you can often see the kind of novices who have been practicing for two months. When they shoot a video, they dare to say, "If you practice with me for a month, you will definitely get better. If you don't get better, come to me." Some people here also feel aggrieved: "I just posted about my daily life, and I didn't force anyone to believe it. He doesn't have the judgment to blame me?" ”But think about it from another perspective, as long as the content you publish publicly has a clear fitness guidance attribute, you will naturally have the obligation to fact-check. If you are naturally low in body fat for two weeks, don’t assume that everyone is the same as you. If you eat that enzyme and have diarrhea for three days and lose two pounds, don’t tell others that it is a fat-burning effect. An ordinary blogger I followed before shared butt training exercises at home. Each action was marked with "Do not do this for those with knee discomfort" and "People with protruding waists need to put a pillow under their waists." No one in the comment area scolded him, but everyone thought he was sincere. Isn't this much more reliable than boasting about his amazing moves to attract fans?

To be honest, home fitness is a low-cost way for ordinary people to exercise. There is no need to make so many vain ethical provisions. In the final analysis, there are three sentences: don't torment your neighbors, don't torment yourself, and don't torment those who believe in you. If you can do these three things, you can practice however you like, and no one can care about it.